People who bought this item also bought:
Product Description
Discover Japan
Dodge flying fish at the world's greatest sashimi market, p. 132
Find yourself spirited away to Miyazaki's museum of anime, p. 141
Master the perfect double-clap and bow for your first shrine visit, p.56
Earn your keep in a Buddhist temple, p. 417
In This Guide:
Japan resident authors, 343 days of research, 120 detailed maps, three geisha sightings
You asked for it, we researched it - everything you need to know about onsen (hot springs) and skiing and more language assistance than ever
Cost-saving tips even the locals don't know
Customer Review:A2UN4S3N7VYLEV
Rating: 
Summary: Amazingly encyclopedic ... and that's not necessarily a good thing
LP Japan has a wonderful wealth of information. In terms of maps, restaurant and hotel reviews, details on every city and town imaginable, logistics on traveling from point A to point B, no one can top it. As a *travel guide* however, LP Japan falls short. The massive amounts of information does not (or should not) hide the fact that as a guidebook, LP Japan simply does not get the job done.
I know that LP has a cult-like following and LP Japan is the number one, best-selling travel guide on Japan but I am at a loss as to why. This guide reads like a phonebook, and although a phonebook is an incredibly valuable reference, one doesn't use a phonebook to plan their vacation. With so many places listed, a book like this needs to make useful recommendations about what to experience and what not to experience. Instead, the recommendations are so sloppy and lazy they are almost criminal. "Three Days in Tokyo" would have you skip Asakusa with its iconic shopping street leading to Senso-ji, Shinjuku (be it for the view from TMG, the experience of catching a rush hour train in the world's busiest station, or the decidedly off-the-temples-and-shrines-beaten-path "entertainment" in Kabuki-cho), Ueno Park, Kabukiza, Akihabara, Meiji Shrine (which it lists as a "highlight" yet doesn't make it on the 3 day itinerary?), etc., etc. Yes, I know they are all described in the Tokyo section ... but they're crammed in with dozens if not hundreds of other sights, many of which have dubious touristic value. It's impossible to identify which are the "memories of a lifetime" experiences and which are the "how did THIS make it into a tourbook?" types.
The "highlights" in the "Around Tokyo" section are notable for the only thing they have in common: none are around Tokyo! Chichi-jima is as "around Tokyo" as Seoul or Vladivostok. Meanwhile, highlights that are actually around Tokyo (I'm looking at you Kamakura) are curiously absent from the list of highlighted locales. I'm a bit biased because I lived there, but I'd argue that Yokohama would be a deserving "highlight" around Tokyo as well (heck, finish off a day trip to Kamakura with dinner in Yokohama's Chinatown and a stroll around the harbor and I'll guarantee you have a more fun day than LP's Tokyo itinerary, which consists of "sleep in and shop" each day after Day 1). Just about every place of note in Central Honshu is listed as a "highlight" ... but no suggestion of how to plan your time there. Despite 60 pages of information on Kyoto, there is no advice as to how to spend your time there as far as I can see. In general, there are some walking tours but not enough for a book of this size. To makes things even more challenging in terms of deciding where to go, they have literally hundreds of sections on towns and cities that no one in their right mind should visit on holiday. If you *really* need to know a few facts about Podunk City, Japan that's what Wikipedia should be for.
If you have a good idea of where you want to go, the massive amount of information is helpful ... but again, because there is also a massive amount of information on places not really worth seeing, even the information on the "must see" places is not quite as robust as you would expect. The eating, sleeping, and entertainment sections usually offer a pretty good range of options. However, when rating this book, I just can't get over the shoddy job this book does with organizing information in such a way as to help the potential visitor plan and prioritize his or her trip to Japan ... you know, to "guide" one's "travel" as a travel guide should. Perhaps some might say I am paying too much attention to this issue of "highlights" and "recommendations" but to me, in the internet age, just having "lots of info" isn't enough for a guidebook anymore when most of it--from train and bus logistics, to hotel and restaurant info, to info on the tourist attractions--is readily available online, and for free. In the internet age, the problem for the potential tourist is usually not that there's not enough information--the traditional concern--but that there's TOO much information to sift through. What would be more useful is not a laundry list of places that reads like a checklist, but suggestions of how to link them together to make for an excellent *experience* in Japan.
Unfortunately, the other Japan travel guides often come up short as well so you'll probably end up using multiple resources to plan your trip; however, if you only could take one guide with you to Japan as an independent traveler, I'd probably recommend the Rough Guide. It's written better and has most of the same information as LP but it's better organized to help you plan your trip. If you're more of a visual person you'll definitely hate LP (and the Rough Guide as well) ... try Insight or Eyewitness (personally they're too "fluffy" for me, but I know many people like them) or even LP's new "Discover" series which I still find too lightweight, but it does have some neat features not in regular LP or even the other visuals-heavy guides like Insight and DK/Eyewitness.
Customer Review:A182795HDCTUVP
Rating: 
Summary: thorough, helpful, but not the best for us
There is a lot of information in this book, but with so much, it really needs to have a better index. We found ourselves using the DK book more.
Customer Review:A23FB5RUKV5KLB
Rating: 
Summary: Excellent Book
Although I haven't still been to Japan, I like the book and feel that it supplies a lot of info - maybe even too much. The book also has Japanese writings for every place. It tries to give you info about accomodations for different budget. Again, as usually (but few exceptions) Lonely Planet is a good book to go.
Customer Review:AIDR99MLKJYU4
Rating:
Summary: Alert -- there is a newer edition of this book!
On my most recent trip to Japan I used brought the Lonely Planet Guide and the Rough Guide. The Lonely Planet Guide is better across the board. It provides better recommendations for hotels and restaurants, better and more detailed advice on sights, and far better information on logistics (how to get places, whether to take the train or a bus, etc.). The Lonely Planet Guide is easier to use and, most importantly more likely to be accurate. The Rough Guide is ok; if that is all you have, you will be fine. On the other hand, given that you have a choice, I'd go with Lonely Planet.
All that said, the Lonely Planet Guide could use improvement. The section on Hokkaido is particularly thin -- not much information. On the other hand, there does not seem to be a guidebook for Hokkaido written in English. If you hear of one, please let me know.
Customer Review:A3RD20CUSS7D0Z
Rating:
Summary: A Great Way to Get Unexcited About Your Trip to Japan
This Lonely Planet Guide is another copy of all the previous Japan guides with all the same disappointments.
Coverage of areas outside of Tokyo and Kyoto is honestly rather shoddy, and they've kept the obnoxious negativity that makes an exciting trip to Japan seem like a waste of time. While other Lonely Planet guides are lively, with authors that seem to enjoy the travelling, Lonely Planet Japan's authors write as though they really don't like Japan. It is questionable whether or not the writers even visited the cities they are reviewing.
This guide is probably most useful as a reference of places to look up on your own in another source.
|
